Wire by Fusion42
Fusion42 Scout Raise
The Debrief & Outliers
Regulatory RadarWorkday Debrief · Mon 09:00 UTCSector Deep DiveWorkday Debrief · Tue 09:00 UTCGeo PulseWorkday Debrief · Wed 09:00 UTCOperating ConditionsWorkday Debrief · Thu 09:00 UTCWeekly BriefingWorkday Debrief · Fri 09:00 UTCWTF Happened This WeekSat 09:00 UTC · 3σ outliers
Benchmarks
Benchmarks HomeBy News TypeBy RegionBy Sector
AI WeeklyAbout

Switch product

Fusion42RaiseScoutWire

The Debrief & Outliers

All editionsRegulatory RadarWorkday Debrief · Mon 09:00 UTCSector Deep DiveWorkday Debrief · Tue 09:00 UTCGeo PulseWorkday Debrief · Wed 09:00 UTCOperating ConditionsWorkday Debrief · Thu 09:00 UTCWeekly BriefingWorkday Debrief · Fri 09:00 UTCWTF Happened This WeekSat 09:00 UTC · 3σ outliers

Database & benchmarks

Benchmarks HomeBy News TypeBy RegionBy SectorStories

Account

Sign in
← Back

Wire · regulatory

Kalshi Subject to Ohio, Tennessee Enforcement After New Ruling

25 September 2026 · By · Wire by Fusion42

Published

25 September 2026

Topic

regulatory

◆ Sectors

Fintech

◆ Geography

United States

◆ Source

Read at news.bloomberglaw.com →

◆ Verified

Fusion42 · 25 September 2026 · Fusion42 review

The Sixth Circuit ruled that Ohio and Tennessee regulators can enforce their sports gambling laws against Kalshi Inc., rejecting Kalshi's claim that the federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction under federal law.

This Wire brief sits within Fusion42's coverage of Fintech.

◆ ◆ The Wire takeaway

You face a tougher regulatory gap as states push back against federal preemption in prediction markets. Revising compliance to align with state gambling laws in Ohio and Tennessee is now urgent.

◆ Coverage

1 source · 25 Sep 2026

◆ Related on Wire

◆ Topics

Fintechregulatory-enforcementsports-bettingCFTCfederal-vs-stateprediction-markets