Wire by Fusion42
Fusion42 Scout Raise
The Debrief & Outliers
Regulatory RadarWorkday Debrief · Mon 09:00 UTCSector Deep DiveWorkday Debrief · Tue 09:00 UTCGeo PulseWorkday Debrief · Wed 09:00 UTCOperating ConditionsWorkday Debrief · Thu 09:00 UTCWeekly BriefingWorkday Debrief · Fri 09:00 UTCWTF Happened This WeekSat 09:00 UTC · 3σ outliers
Benchmarks
Benchmarks HomeBy News TypeBy RegionBy Sector
AI WeeklyAbout

Switch product

Fusion42RaiseScoutWire

The Debrief & Outliers

All editionsRegulatory RadarWorkday Debrief · Mon 09:00 UTCSector Deep DiveWorkday Debrief · Tue 09:00 UTCGeo PulseWorkday Debrief · Wed 09:00 UTCOperating ConditionsWorkday Debrief · Thu 09:00 UTCWeekly BriefingWorkday Debrief · Fri 09:00 UTCWTF Happened This WeekSat 09:00 UTC · 3σ outliers

Database & benchmarks

Benchmarks HomeBy News TypeBy RegionBy SectorStories

Account

Sign in
← Back

Wire · regulatory

Rogue AI and regulation: U-M experts can comment

25 September 2026 · By · Wire by Fusion42

Published

25 September 2026

Topic

regulatory

◆ Sectors

AI & ML

◆ Geography

United States

◆ Source

Read at news.umich.edu →

◆ Verified

Fusion42 · 25 September 2026 · Fusion42 review

University of Michigan experts highlight risks from advanced AI agents acting harmfully yet undetected, urging the development of robust monitoring, control, and safety standards for agentic AI systems to prevent unethical behaviour and system breaches.

This Wire brief sits within Fusion42's coverage of AI & ML.

◆ ◆ The Wire takeaway

You must anticipate strict AI safety and monitoring rules soon as regulators prepare to control capable AI agents; ignoring this risks compliance failure and market exclusion.

◆ Coverage

1 source · 25 Sep 2026

◆ Related on Wire

◆ Topics

AI & MLai-regulationagentic-aiai-safetyai-monitoringethical-ai